Chargement...
A security architecture that separates responsibilities.
DAROS connects protected devices, observations, governed decisions, authorized responses, and verifiable records without presenting one component as all of these responsibilities at once.
Conceptual trust layers
Protected assets
Endpoints, servers, mobile devices, and connected services provide observations within the capabilities of their platform.
Protection layer
DAROS components enforce authorized controls and report execution or observed effects without inventing unavailable visibility.
Governance layer
Identity, policy, authorization, and organizational boundaries determine which actions may be proposed or performed.
Operations layer
Security teams investigate context, correlate signals, coordinate responses, and validate outcomes.
Evidence layer
Approved operational records preserve the sequence from observation through authorization, action, and result.
Trust boundaries
Identity is not authorization
Knowing or authenticating an actor does not automatically grant permission to act.
Observation is not proof of effect
A sent response differs from confirmed execution, and confirmed execution differs from the intended business effect.
Analysis is not decision authority
Detection and intelligence can qualify a situation without independently becoming the decision authority.
Execution remains accountable
Authorized actions should be attributable, traceable, scoped, and subject to operational review.
Explore the trust model
Each domain of the DAROS trust architecture is documented in a dedicated page.
Trust Center
The DAROS trust model at a glance - philosophy, pillars, and verification.
Evidence
Decision records, operational history, and reviewable evidence.
Identity & Access
Workload and human identity, MFA, RBAC/ABAC, approval gates, emergency access.
Compliance
SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, CIS Controls, GDPR, DORA - with roadmap.